Ultraman is not afraid of his mansion being attacked; he has a fortress.
In 2016, Sam Altman built an underground bunker in Wyoming. 1,200 square meters, three-level structure, 500 kg of gold, 5,000 potassium iodide tablets, 5 tons of freeze-dried food, 100,000 bullets. That same year, OpenAI had just celebrated its first anniversary.
Ten years later, the leader of the world's most powerful AI company was attacked two weekends in a row, first with a Molotov cocktail, then with gunfire. In a blog post, he admitted to severely underestimating the "power of narrative." Whose narrative was he referring to, someone else's or his own?
48 Hours, Two Attacks
At 3:40 am on April 10, San Francisco Chestnut Street. A 20-year-old man, Daniel Moreno-Gama, threw a Molotov cocktail at the metal gate of Sam Altman's apartment. The fire ignited near the outer gate, and he fled. About an hour later, the same individual appeared near OpenAI's San Francisco office, continuing to threaten arson and was subsequently arrested. Charges included attempted murder and arson.

Sam Altman's San Francisco residence and surveillance footage of the arson suspect
Two days later, at 1:40 am on April 12, a Honda sedan parked next to Altman's residence in the Russian Hill area. A passenger in the car extended their hand out the window and fired a shot towards the residence. Surveillance footage captured the license plate, leading to the arrest of two individuals: Amanda Tom (25) and Muhamad Tarik Hussein (23). Three guns were found during a search of the residence, and the two were charged with reckless discharge of a firearm.
One weekend, two attacks.
The suspect in the first case, Daniel Moreno-Gama, was an AI doomsayer. He quoted themes of human vs. machine from "Dune" on social media, wrote articles arguing that AI alignment failure posed an existential risk, criticized tech leaders for pursuing "hyperhumanism," and taking an "all-in bet on the fate of humanity."
What was his argument?
Over the past five years, one of OpenAI's standard moves in constructing the narrative around AI is to repeatedly emphasize the "existential" threat of AGI. This discourse serves multiple purposes: to urge governments to take regulation seriously, to help investors understand the stakes, and to make the entire industry realize that this race is too important to lose. This narrative serves a function, positioning OpenAI as simultaneously at the frontier of danger, the most responsible, and therefore the rightful recipient of funding.
However, the phrase "this is the most dangerous technology in human history" will not just stay within the tech and investor circles once it's out there. It will trickle down and become a literal call to action for some. Moreno-Gama wrote in an ins post, "Exponential progress plus misalignment equals existential risk." The original source of this argumentative framework is mainstream literature on AI safety, much of it funded or endorsed by OpenAI.

Daniel Moreno-Gama Social Media Account
After the first attack, Ultraman blogged. He posted a photo with his child, saying he hoped this picture would prevent the next person from throwing a Molotov cocktail at his home. He acknowledged the opponents' "legitimate moral stance" and called for a public discussion "with a little less explosiveness in both the literal and metaphorical sense."
He also responded to a New Yorker deep dive. The article, published days before the attack, openly questioned his credibility as the ultimate AI authority. He wrote, "I severely underestimated the power of public narrative and discourse."
Two days later, his residence was shot at.
Security Budgeting Is a Statement; a Bunker Is Another
The starting point of this trajectory is a year earlier than most people realize.
December 4, 2024, New York. UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson was shot outside the Hilton Hotel. Suspect Luigi Mangione, an Ivy League graduate, left behind a handwritten statement criticizing the health insurance industry. The case sparked an unusual wave of reactions on social media: a substantial number of regular users openly expressed sympathy for the perpetrator, even turning him into some kind of rebel symbol.
At that moment, some doors were pushed ajar.
Following the Thompson incident, executive security went from being a "perk" to a "survival necessity." According to research data cited by Fortune magazine, since 2023, there has been a 225% increase in violent crime attacks on top corporate executives. In the S&P 500, 33.8% of companies reported executive security expenses in their financial reports in 2025, up from 23.3% in 2020. Firms providing security services had a median cost of $130,000, a 20% year-on-year increase, doubling in five years.
The AI industry is the latest and most prominent recipient of this trend. The total security expenditure of the top ten tech giants' CEOs in 2024 exceeded $45 million. Mark Zuckerberg alone exceeded $27 million, higher than the sum of the security expenses of four other CEOs such as Apple and Google. Jensen Huang of NVIDIA had $3.5 million in 2025, a 59% increase year-over-year. Sundar Pichai of Google had $8.27 million, a 22% increase.
The AI industry has something unique that few other industries have: even the creators themselves believe this technology could destroy civilization. In 2025, the Pew Research Center surveyed 28,333 respondents worldwide, with only 16% expressing excitement about AI development and 34% expressing concern. A counterintuitive finding was that the higher the level of education and income, the stronger the concern about AI running amok. The most knowledgeable are the most afraid.
Recently, the home of Indianapolis City Councilman Ron Gibson was shot at by a gunman firing 13 shots in the middle of the night, waking up his 8-year-old son. A handwritten note was left at the door, saying, "No data centers allowed." The FBI has intervened in the investigation. Jordyn Abrams, a researcher at the George Washington University's Extremism Program, pointed out that data centers are becoming targets of anti-tech and anti-government extremists.

Ron Gibson Shooting Scene
This fear is not a secret within the industry; it's just not openly discussed.
Ultraman built the fortress in Wyoming in 2016. That year, OpenAI had just been announced, outlining to the world how AI would benefit humanity. Both events coincided: he publicly bet that AI would succeed while privately stockpiling enough ammunition to support an armed militia.
This was a rational double bet: publicly betting on AI's success and privately preparing for AI to go rogue.
Ultraman's Boomerang
On February 27 this year, OpenAI signed a contract with the US Department of Defense, allowing the Pentagon to deploy ChatGPT on a classified defense network for use in "any lawful purpose." On the same day, Ultraman also publicly endorsed Anthropic's position on limits for AI military applications. Subsequently, ChatGPT's daily uninstall rate surged by 295%, and one-star reviews increased by 775% within 24 hours. The QuitGPT boycott movement reportedly accumulated over 1.5 million participants.
On March 21st, about 200 protesters marched in San Francisco, spanning Anthropic, OpenAI, and xAI, demanding the CEOs of the three companies commit to pausing cutting-edge AI development. Concurrently, London saw its largest anti-AI protest to date.
Ultraman's Wyoming redoubt and the security detail he employs address two distinct risks, one from outsiders and one from what he himself is building. He takes both risks seriously in private but acknowledges only one in public.
The week of the first attack, The New Yorker published a deep dive into Ultraman. Journalists Ronan Farrow and Andrew Marantz interviewed over 100 sources, with the central thesis distilled into just two words: untrustworthy. The article quoted a former OpenAI board member labeling Ultraman an "antisocial personality," "untethered to truth." Multiple ex-colleagues described his shifting positions on AI safety, often reshaping power structures as needed.
In his blog response, Ultraman admitted to having a "conflict-avoidant" tendency. He had crafted a public narrative of "AI as an existential threat" as a tool for fundraising and regulatory maneuvering. As a result, this tool slipped from his grip, made a circuit, and came crashing back at his door.
You may also like

Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle

Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."

$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage

Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.

Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.

White House Discusses CLARITY Act With Law Enforcement Ahead of Senate Vote
The White House discussed the CLARITY Act with law enforcement ahead of a Senate vote, focusing on illicit finance risks and developer protections.

Bitcoin Trading Guide 2026: Strategies for Experienced Traders

What Is XAUT and PAXG? Why Tokenized Gold Is Booming in 2026

Will the SpaceX IPO Hurt Bitcoin? Here's What Traders Are Watching

Foreign selling in the South Korean stock market accelerates, with cumulative net sales reportedly reaching $75 billion this year
On June 9, The Kobeissi Letter, citing Goldman Sachs data, reported that global investors are selling South Korean stocks at an unusually rapid pace. In the latest trading session, foreign investors sold about $801 million worth of Kospi constituent stocks again; total foreign outflows last week reached about $10 billion, and the market has been in net foreign selling on nearly every trading day over the past month. According to the data cited in the report, foreign investors have sold about $75 billion worth of South Korean stocks so far this year. Meanwhile, South Korean retail and institutional investors together recorded roughly $69 billion in net buying over the same period, suggesting that the market’s main buying support has come from domestic capital rather than returning overseas funds. The information currently disclosed still mainly comes from The Kobeissi Letter’s retelling and Goldman Sachs data summaries, while public details on the statistical period and the specific definition of “selling” remain relatively limited.

Fortune Warns of Strategy’s Financing Structure Risks as Bitcoin Premium Narrows
Fortune warned that Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model faces growing financing risks as MSTR’s net asset premium narrows and preferred stock dividend pressure increases.

Ferrari Challenge Le Mans: Carl Moon to Dominate in WEEX Livery

Sahara AI Responds to SAHARA’s Sharp Drop: No Contract or Product Security Issues Found, Internal Investigation Underway
Sahara AI responded to SAHARA’s 60% price drop, saying no token contract or product security issues have been found and an internal investigation is underway.

WEEX Deposit/Withdrawal Dynamic Island: Your Asset Status, Always in Sight

Scaling Crypto Derivatives: The Digital Asset Infrastructure Behind High-Volume Trading
In the fast-moving digital asset ecosystem, derivatives platforms face an extreme architectural test. High-leverage futures markets demand more than just standard security—they require absolute operational precision, zero-latency matching engines, and ironclad structural scalability, all while navigating intense market volatility.
As global platforms scale to meet these demands, the industry is shifting away from rigid, monolithic setups toward a more agile, "decoupled" infrastructure philosophy.
The Blueprint for High-Volume Copy TradingFor elite global exchanges like WEEX (founded in 2018), this architectural choice becomes critical when scaling high-volume retail features like social copy trading. When thousands of users automatically mirror the real-time strategies of elite traders simultaneously, it triggers sudden, monumental spikes in concurrent transactional volume.
To prevent execution latency or settlement bottlenecks during these peak volatility events, a platform's primary engine must remain entirely dedicated to risk management, copy-trade synchronization, and order matching.
The Architectural Rule: New-generation platforms must separate front-end user execution engines from heavy backend infrastructural overhead to eliminate operational friction.
By separating these layers, platforms can maintain complete sovereignty over their trading environments and user experiences while strategically aligning with institutional-grade infrastructure ecosystems. This strategic framework allows modern exchanges to leverage advanced Digital Asset Custody infrastructure such as Cobo’s behind the scenes, ensuring that backend wallet management scales elastically alongside trading spikes.
Capitalizing on Market Momentum and 400× LeverageIn a derivatives arena where platforms offer up to 400× leverage on perpetual contracts, capital efficiency and market agility are core business metrics. To capture market momentum, an exchange needs the ability to rapidly expand its asset offerings, supporting everything from legacy crypto assets to sudden, trending altcoins across a massive library of trading pairs.
Adopting a flexible, scalable Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS) solution such as Cobo’s could completely rewrite the development timeline for high-growth exchanges. Instead of spending months of engineering capital building out custom backend wallet architectures for every new blockchain network, platforms can deploy localized infrastructure in days.
This agility allows platforms to instantly scale their listings to over a thousand trading pairs without compromising security or delaying time-to-market. It mirrors the exact operational advantages seen during high-velocity market events, similar to how advanced wallet infrastructure empowers platforms during sudden asset surges; allowing exchanges to pass that speed and liquidity directly to their global user base.
A Mature Foundation for GrowthThe synergy between trusted infrastructure ecosystems and global trading platforms represents the natural evolution of a maturing crypto market. As WEEX continues to scale its global spot and derivatives offerings for over 6 million users, adopting robust backend paradigms proves that platforms no longer have to compromise between cutting-edge trading velocity and uncompromised structural security.

Get Paid to Onboard? Try WEEX’s New Homepage with Rewards for Registration, Deposit & Trade

WEEX Custom Layout: Build Your Perfect Trading Workspace in Seconds
Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market
Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle
Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."
$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage
Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.
Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.
