Trump's Tariffs Hit Global Economy, Can Cryptocurrency Be a Safe Haven?

By: blockbeats|2025/04/10 11:30:03
0
Share
copy
Original Article Title: Crypto's Edge in a Tariff World
Original Article Author: Marco Manoppo, Investor at Primitive Ventures
Original Article Translation: Deep Translations

Editor's Note: The article explores the value of cryptocurrency as a hedge in the context of a global trade war and escalating tariff barriers. The author points out that tariff policies lead to higher inflation, market distortions, and historical evidence shows more harm than good. Cryptocurrency, with its decentralization, sovereignty, and cross-border liquidity, may become a new asset choice to deal with geopolitical uncertainties and economic chaos. Although cryptocurrency (such as Bitcoin) has not fully demonstrated its "digital gold" hedge properties, its borderless economic system is challenging the traditional financial order.

The following is the original content (slightly restructured for better readability):

As the trade war reshapes the global economic landscape, cryptocurrency once again has the opportunity to prove its value as a hedge against chaos.

Background Context

"Madness is rare in individual, but in groups, parties, nations, and ages it is the rule." — Friedrich Nietzsche

The market is in intense turmoil. As the Prime Minister of Singapore said, the United States is essentially abandoning the economic system it has built with its own hands. The cornerstone of the global economic system is gradually being eroded. The author believes that if the situation is not quickly brought under control, more areas will face collapse.

Cryptocurrency has always been a macro-dominant asset. One of the core arguments that Bitcoin purists advocate throughout the year is "sovereignty."

In short, Bitcoin as an asset can hedge against geopolitical uncertainty because it is a theoretically harder form of money than gold. But so far, this theory has not been validated: Bitcoin's transactional characteristics are closer to the Nasdaq beta coefficient, and its performance during turbulent times is far inferior to gold. Will this time be different?

Trump's Tariffs Hit Global Economy, Can Cryptocurrency Be a Safe Haven?

Gold vs Bitcoin Price Trend Chart

Essence of Tariffs Analysis

If you want to witness the intellectual self-pleasure, there is no better time than now than scrolling through Twitter — everyone suddenly becomes a macroeconomist. To avoid adding to the cognitive burden, the author only lists objective facts:

· Tariffs fundamentally create inefficiencies, raise consumer prices, distort free markets, trigger economic retaliation actions, and escalate conflicts.

· A typical case can be traced back to the 1980s: Despite President Ronald Reagan initially implementing tariffs in some areas, he eventually acknowledged their drawbacks. He clearly stated in a 1987 broadcast speech: "Protectionism becomes destructionism; it costs jobs."

Chinese Embassy in the U.S. Twitter, Reagan vs. Tariffs: The 1987 Speech Reappears in 202 with Realistic Significance, by Maoning

Why Tariffs Are Not a Good Thing

First, the effective tariffs currently implemented by Trump are the highest level in over 100 years - but there are still many reasons against it:

Economic Impact and Inflation

At the core of tariffs is a tax on imported goods, paid by domestic importers, and these costs are often passed on to consumers. Historical and contemporary evidence consistently shows that tariffs directly lead to consumer price increases.

· For example, according to the Tax Foundation, recent U.S. tariffs will increase the average tax burden per household by over $2,100.

· The Yale Budget Model estimates that the annual impact on each household could be as high as $3,800.

· UBS Group predicts that just a 10% general tariff could trigger a 10% stock market decline.

Misconceptions About Trade Deficits

One of the core reasons cited by supporters of tariffs is the large trade deficit. However, a trade deficit itself does not mean a weak economy or exploitation.

· It simply indicates that a country imports more goods than it exports, often driven by strong consumption demand, a strong currency, or comparative advantages in services rather than goods.

· For example, the U.S. has long enjoyed a significant surplus in high-value service sectors such as finance, technology, and high-end manufacturing. Imposing tariffs on goods trade deficits, especially in cases where many countries lack the wealth or demand to import U.S. products, will artificially raise prices for American consumers.

· Countries like Cambodia and Kiribati are typical examples of this situation; their trade deficits exist because these countries are too poor to buy U.S.-made products, not because they engage in unfair trade.

Even countries with a trade surplus with the United States are being hit by tariffs.

Historical Consequences of Tariffs

Historically, protectionist tariffs have often led to economic downturns rather than prosperity.

· Famous examples include the Tariff of 1828 and the notorious 1930 Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act. The latter, through triggering retaliatory tariffs, shrinking global trade, and deepening global economic woes, exacerbated the Great Depression.

· Economists generally agree that history has repeatedly shown that tariffs often do more harm than good.

· Even McKinley, often seen as a tariff inspiration by Trump, began to oppose tariffs by the end of his presidency, acknowledging their negative impact on the economy.

The Myth of Inefficiency and Job Creation

Tariffs are often promised as a means to revitalize domestic manufacturing and create job opportunities. However, modern manufacturing is highly automated and capital-intensive, meaning that even if factories return to the U.S., they require fewer workers.

· With global automation accelerating, reshoring driven by tariffs will not bring about the job boom politicians often promise.

· In fact, many manufacturers either absorb higher costs or slightly less efficiently shift to other low-cost countries, leading to minimal new domestic job creation.

· The unintended consequence is often economic stagnation or decline. When Argentina adopted protectionist policies under Peronism, it shifted from one of the world's wealthiest nations to an economic wasteland and has yet to fully recover.

Strategic Risks in Global Trade Dynamics

Tariffs may inadvertently strengthen geopolitical adversaries by triggering global trade realignments. Historical evidence emphasizes that trade wars are globally harmful, leading to economic contractions, supply chain instability, and significant harm to consumer welfare.

· For example, the widespread tariffs recently implemented by Trump have not only raised domestic prices but also, by disrupting the supply chains of countries competing with China, inadvertently benefited China.

· Countries like Vietnam, previously positioned as alternatives to China, are now facing steep tariffs that may push production back to China despite the high tariffs due to China's economies of scale and manufacturing efficiency.

· Furthermore, tariffs may trigger retaliatory measures from trading partners, igniting a trade war. The European Union has hinted at possible retaliatory tariffs, especially targeting U.S. tech companies, increasing the risk of a broader economic conflict.

Market Dislikes Uncertainty

The market dislikes uncertainty, and tariffs bring exactly that. Trump's recent tariff statements have caused severe market turmoil, with stock market volatility sharply increasing.

· Sectors such as retail, technology, consumer goods, and manufacturing are particularly affected, as they anticipate rising input costs and reduced consumer spending.

· Furthermore, due to decreased global trust and reduced capital inflows, tariffs have weakened the dollar, leading to broader economic instability. This volatility not only undermines consumer and business confidence but also suppresses investment, further hindering economic growth.

CBOE Volatility Index $VIX closed at its highest level since the COVID-19 pandemic

Misconception of National Security

National security is one of the few legitimate reasons that can be used for limited strategic tariffs.

· However, the current tariff regime is widely and indiscriminately applied, severely undermining the credibility of the true national security argument.

· The current practice does not strategically protect key industries but rather indiscriminately raises costs on almost all imported goods, while harming both strategic and non-strategic sectors.

Cryptocurrency: Hedging Chaos

Tariffs and trade wars strongly remind people that nations are ultimately made up of a group of humans, driven by inherent emotions and tribal decisions—decisions designed to benefit their own group, even if, from a broader perspective, they are irrational. In such an environment, cryptocurrency becomes especially important as it represents true personal ownership and sovereignty, providing the highest form of economic agency in an increasingly unpredictable world influenced by geopolitical manipulations.

Cryptocurrency → A super digital economic system used for chaos hedging.

As Ray Dalio aptly pointed out, trade conflicts rarely truly concern trade but are more about identity, pride, domestic politics, and emotional interests. Meanwhile, beneath the noise of geopolitical conflicts, cryptocurrency is quietly building an alternative economic infrastructure where tariffs and traditional borders no longer exist.

Traditional governments struggle to accurately track digital services and their intangible economic impact in trade balance calculations. Cryptocurrency takes this to a whole new level, encapsulating digital activities and transactions beyond borders, tariffs, and political friction.

Technically, we still need to figure out how to appropriately integrate the on-chain properties of cryptocurrency with new business models (referencing my earlier point), but this is still a work in progress.

Conclusion: When government actions become unpredictable or fail to safeguard the interests of the people, how should global sovereign individuals allocate resources? Cryptocurrency has provided its own answer.

Original Article Link

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more