Splurging $80 Million in Growth "Subsidies," Uniswap is Taking Big Steps

By: blockbeats|2025/04/15 16:30:01
0
Share
copy

On February 14, 2025, Devin Walsh, Executive Director and Co-founder of the Uniswap Foundation, initiated a liquidity incentive proposal regarding Uniswap v4 and Unichain in the Uniswap Governance DAO. The proposal passed through Temp Check on March 3 and was formally completed on March 21 in tally on Snapshot, with a total of 53 million UNI tokens and 468 addresses participating in the vote. The plan's technical support partner, Gauntlet, announced that the first phase of activities under this proposal would last for 2 weeks and commence on April 15.

The proposal sparked intense community discussion upon its release, with some expressing support while others believed the plan to be meaningless and detrimental to DAO interests. This article will detail the main contents of the proposal, how to participate, and the community's perspectives.

Splurging $80 Million in Growth

Proposal Details

The proposal encompasses plans for the next six months of UniSwap v4 and one year of Unichain. The Foundation's goal for Uniswap v4 over the next six months is to migrate the 30-day rolling trading volume of $32.8 billion from v3 to the target chain's v4. A budget of $24 million has been applied for this six-month plan.

On the other hand, Unichain's activities are planned to span an entire year. The Foundation's plan for the next three months is to achieve a TVL of $7.5 billion and a cumulative trading volume of $110 billion on Unichain. To achieve the aforementioned goals, Unichain plans to request around $60 million in incentives for the first year, including the $21 million requested in this proposal. Operating similarly to Uniswap v4, the rewards will consider non-DEX DeFi activities to increase organic liquidity demand, primarily composed of the Uniswap Foundation and other projects built on Unichain.

The incentive activities on both chains differ slightly. Uniswap v4's activities will focus on driving AMM trading volume on each chain, while Unichain's activities will strategically deploy AMM incentives to promote broader DeFi activities across the chain and internally within AMMs.

The initial Unichain activity will commence on April 15, 2025, for a duration of three months, distributing millions of dollars in incentive funds. The $UNI incentive measures will be spread across 12 different Unichain pools to reward LPs. For the first two weeks, the following 12 pools will receive $UNI rewards: $USDC/$ETH, $USDC/$USDT0, $ETH/$WBTC, $USDC/$WBTC, $UNI/$ETH, $ETH/$USDT0, $WBTC/$USDT0, $wstETH/$ETH, $weETH/$ETH, $rsETH/$ETH, $ezETH/$ETH, $COMP/$ETH.

In this event, Gauntlet and Merkl play a significant role. Gauntlet is a simulation platform for on-chain risk management that uses agent-based simulation to adjust key protocol parameters, thereby enhancing capital efficiency, fees, risk, and incentives. Merkl, on the other hand, is incubated by a16z and is a one-stop platform that integrates multiple chains and DeFi investment opportunities across protocols.

In this event, Gauntlet provides its "Aera" treasury insurance technology, where funds approved through DAO voting for a grant are stored in a treasury vault. Gauntlet identifies the most liquid pools on each network and calculates the additional yield required to make Uniswap v4 a more economically attractive choice. Adjustments are made every two weeks, determining which pools receive incentives and how much, with reward distribution details available on the Merkl website.

Aggressive Growth Goals, Traditional Growth Strategies

Incentive Effectiveness and Subsequent Retention Discussion

Member "UreNotInD" initially opposed this proposal in the DAO voting discussion, primarily because the proposal, when requesting funds, drew parallels to the spending of funds on liquidity by other projects, such as "Aerodrome spending $40-50 million per month, ZkSync Ignite spending $420 million over 9 months, and Arbitrum spending nearly $200 million since March last year." He believed this to be a tired strategy that many projects have already attempted with minimal results.

Meanwhile, the strongest competitor Fluid is gaining market share without offering any incentives. The popular L2 network Base has successfully captured market share without user incentives. These measures do not address the structural problems that can help Unichain grow, such as interoperability between layer-1 chains, creating unique DeFi use cases, improving on-chain native asset issuance (RWA, meme coins, AI tokens), as native assets are the stickiest. The foundation should attract and fund more developers through the aforementioned methods.

Member "0xkeyrock.eth" shares the same concern, believing that Gauntlet's report should be publicly shared on the forum. The report incurred significant costs, yet the information presented on the forum is superficial and insufficient to justify such a large-scale incentive program.

He raised several unreasonable points in his reports. For example, Aerodrome's high incentive is due to 100% of the fees being redistributed to veHolders, making it incomparable to liquidity incentive models. Additionally, zkSync's monthly $5 million token reward only increased TVL from $100 million to $2.66 billion.

Meanwhile, Unichain's total TVL is only $10 million, indicating a lack of organic demand for Unichain. Gauntlet's claim to raise Unichain to a $750 million TVL with $7 million monthly incentives appears questionable.

While subsidy-driven activities may temporarily boost activity, the sustainability of demand is uncertain. Historical cases like MODE's TVL dropping from $575 million to $19 million, Manta's from $667 million to $46 million, and Blast's from $2.27 billion to $233 million suggest Unichain may face a similar fate.

Building on this, comparing UniSwap's "TVL Growth per Dollar Incentivized" data across chains from Forse Analytics reveals that in the most developed infrastructure on L2 like Base, the best-case scenario is $2,600 TVL per dollar, while the worst-performing Blast is around $500. To reach the $750 million TVL goal, a simple calculation shows the former would need $300,000 daily and the latter would need $1.5 million.

Although analog data is imperfect, it represents a certain range proportion. To raise Unichain's TVL to $750 million with $7 million in three months, infrastructure completeness and user levels need to be elevated to levels similar to Base. Additionally, Blast, the worst-performing chain, has a TVL over 10 times that of Unichain.

The member also shared data on the activity results of Uniswap v3's incentive plan for new chain deployments in 2024. The best-performing was Sei's DEX TVL ranking 6th in the chain's ecosystem with only $718,000 TVL, while the worst was Polygon zkEVM with a meager $2,600 TVL, ranking 13th in DEX TVL. None of these deployments exceeded $1 million in TVL and hardly any entered the top DEX on the chain. These deployments mostly lost their vitality, with the only trading activity coming from arbitrageurs correcting outdated prices.

Table created by 0xkeyrock.eth, showing the TVL harvested after Uniswap's multi-chain deployment incentives and the ranking within DEXes

However, these incentive pool deployments have hardly generated any flywheel effect and have experienced a cliff-like drop after the activity ended. Uniswap spent $2.75 million on these deployments, excluding the protocol's match amount, with an annualized cost for these deployments of $310,000. Even with fee conversion to recoup costs (assuming a 15% fee capture), the DAO can only generate about $46,500 in revenue annually, equivalent to a 1.7% return rate, and it would take 59 years to achieve breakeven.

The dashed lines represent the incentive activity period, and almost all liquidity pools experienced a cliff-like drop after the activity

Of course, some members have also stated that despite the widespread liquidity cliff drop after the end of incentives, this incentive program remains the most effective strategy. Member "alicecorsini" used Forse Analytics data in a recent review of UNI incentives on Uniswap v3 on Base to show the difficulty of retaining users, liquidity, and trading volume after the incentives end.

For Base, Uniswap's main competitor is Aerodrome, but the data presents a more complex scenario. 27.8% of Uniswap incentive LPs provided liquidity to Aerodrome after the incentives ended, with 84.5% completely leaving Uniswap, and about 64.8% of users who left Uniswap did not switch to Aerodrome, even though they had a better APR than the incentive-free Uniswap v3.

While some LPs have migrated to Aerodrome, a larger proportion of users have simply exited directly rather than moving to a direct competitor. This indicates a broader structural challenge in retaining users and liquidity. He believes that brainstorming some methods to improve retention through the deployment of incentives "simultaneously" is a worthwhile effort, but this incentive plan remains the most effective strategy as the first step in the traffic funnel.

Community Skepticism of Gauntlet's Capability

Community member Pepo "@0xPEPO" expressed concerns about Gauntlet's capabilities on social media X, noting that the Uniswap Foundation had already paid participation fees of $1.2 million and $1.25 million to Aera and Gauntlet, respectively, even before the proposal was approved. However, there are doubts about whether the Aera team has the ability to deliver on such a project as they lack a track record.

He mentioned that Uniswap's Growth Manager designated by Gauntlet, Peteris Erins, was the founder of Auditless and a member of the Aera team. Despite Peteris having little to no public track record outside of his work at Aera, the only notable public achievement was that the protocol reached over $80 million TVL in its first year.

However, he believes that this total locked value may not be a true performance indicator, as every customer of Aera is also a customer of Gauntlet. When a company's performance relies on its parent company, the growth data becomes questionable. He further compared Aave and Gauntlet's data, suggesting that Gauntlet may have been hindering growth, and after Aave parted ways with Gauntlet, both TVL and profitability saw significant increases.

Devin Walsh, Executive Director and Co-Founder of the Uniswap Foundation, responded to this by stating that Gauntlet has undergone a more rigorous review than typical partners in the past, having undergone two due diligence processes.

The first was in early 2023 when selecting an advisor for incentive analysis. To choose a vendor, we provided similar proposals to three potential partners and evaluated the final results based on the rigor, comprehensiveness of the analysis, and the ability to drive execution post-analysis. Gauntlet's performance far exceeded other companies at that time. The second was in the third quarter of 2024, where the Foundation assessed a group of candidates to determine who was best suited to partner in carrying out the incentive activities for Uniswap v4 and Unichain. We evaluated candidates' track records, relevant experience, and ability to achieve expected outcomes. Based on the analysis, we believed Gauntlet was best suited for the task. At the same time, we took the opportunity to renegotiate the contract, currently planning to pay per activity and lock in the rate until 2027.

Recurring Security Issue of USDT0 Underlying Technology Layer0

Before the event started, analyst Todd "0x_Todd" pointed out the security vulnerability of USDT0 on social media platform X. USDT0 is the cross-chain version of USDT, with the parent asset USDT existing on ETH and crossing to other chains through Layer0 becoming USDT0. The chains supporting USDT0 can also cross-chain with each other, such as ETH-Arb-Unichain-BearChain-megaETH, and so on.

USDT0 is led by Everdawn Labs, utilizing Layer0's underlying technology and backed by Tether and INK. Todd expressed concerns about the trustworthiness of Layer0, stating, "My level of trust in Layer0 is limited, and the history of failures in top cross-chain bridges is abundant, from multichain to thorchai; cross-chain technology is fundamentally low-threshold, merely involving multisigs." Due to the current situation, apart from bearing the risks of Tether and Uniswap, there are an additional 4 risks to consider, namely the security of Everdawn, Layer0, Unichain, and the security of other chains supporting USDT0. If other chains are compromised and USDT0 experiences unlimited minting, then Unichain's USDT0 will also be tainted.

How Can Users Farm?

Visit Merkl to view the incentive pools. These incentive mechanisms may increase or decrease over time. To efficiently farm $UNI, one must constantly monitor the reward changes in the 12 pools.

Provide liquidity to these pools by supplying liquidity to the incentive pools from any interface and receive liquidity mining rewards.

Claim rewards on the Merkl personal interface, where users can claim rewards through the Merkl interface or any interface connected to the Merkl API.

Overall, most of the community users do not have a positive view of this proposal. They believe that it is harmful to $UNI holders in various ways. However, for retail investors who simply want to farm $UNI, they need to be cautious of the potential risks involved and pay attention to the bi-weekly changes in liquidity pool rewards. In anticipation of potential future risks, BlockBeats will continue to monitor and report on developments.

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more