Rare APY of 400%, is TradeXYZ handing out money to oil bulls?
Amid the murky situation of the Iran conflict, the crude oil market has experienced significant volatility.
At the same time, a rare phenomenon occurred in the WTIOIL-USDC crude oil perpetual contract on Trade.xyz: the annualized funding rate remained stable between -300% and -400%. This means that any trader willing to long at this moment would receive daily profits equivalent to 1% of their principal from the short positions.
The market doesn't give away money for free. To understand this abnormal negative rate, we need to start with the basics of futures trading.
Rolling
Crude oil futures are a series of contracts arranged by delivery months. May delivery, June delivery, July delivery, each with its price. As the front month nears expiration, the market transitions from the old contract to the new contract in a process known as rolling.
Under normal circumstances, a distant month contract means that oil producers will store the oil for a few more months, incurring additional storage costs. Therefore, the delivery price should be higher. The market refers to the phenomenon where future contracts are more expensive than near-month contracts as Contango, in stark contrast, the situation where near-month contracts are more expensive than distant-month contracts is called backwardation. This usually occurs when there is a current shortage and everyone wants to get the oil now.

During this Trade.xyz crude oil roll, the crude oil futures market exhibited this structure of near-month prices being higher than distant-month prices.

From late March to early April 2026, the WTI crude oil curve was in an extreme spot price premium. As shown in the above image, the price of the May contract (near-month) consistently remained above the June contract (distant-month), with the spread widening to over $14.
And the WTIOIL-USDC perpetual contract on Trade.xyz had its oracle anchored to this May near-month contract.
However, we are not going to trade this May contract indefinitely. It must be rolled over to the next June contract. So how is the rolling process executed?
According to the Tradexyz documentation, the oracle will take 5 trading days to gradually shift the price weight from 100% near-month contract to 100% distant-month contract.

In the context of "Spot Price Premium," this means that the oracle price on Tradexyz will drop from the near-month price to the far-month price within 5 trading days.

Market participants familiar with this mechanism have a clear expectation of the post-rollover contract price. Everyone knows it will drop, leading to a rush of short positions. Shorts accumulate, the funding rate turns negative, and shorts start paying longs.

From the perspective of the no-arbitrage principle, this is normal. The price difference between the near month and far month gives shorts a profit. The funding rate then shrinks this profit back. The larger the spread, the higher the negative funding rate the market charges.
Once the negative funding rate reaches a certain point, this seemingly obvious arbitrage will be flattened out again. The shorts' costs will completely cover the profit.
Strategy
How can you make money in such a market scenario? Here are three common strategies.
1. Short Tradexyz's crude oil contract at the current price while going long on the CME far-month contract.
This seemingly risk-neutral strategy can earn a stable spread. However, several factors have not been taken into account.
Assuming a short position on Trade.xyz's WTI contract at $95.352 on April 8, while simultaneously longing the June futures contract at $87.75, each with a $10,000 nominal principal. If both sides eventually converge, theoretically, you can get a price difference of $7.60, equivalent to a profit of about $797. However, the short-term funding rate on April 8 is already at 1.42%. Calculating based on the remaining 6 days until rollover completion, you would need to pay $851 in funding rate. At this point, the net profit is only -$53. This calculation does not yet include transaction fees and slippage.

Abraxas Capital implemented this strategy right after the last rollover on March 19. They held a Brent crude position on tradexyz, accounting for 20% of the market's open interest, and initially gained substantial profits when the funding rate was relatively neutral. However, as more arbitrageurs entered the market, the funding rate has now consumed 80% of their arbitrage profits.
A large position also means they have difficulty exiting and can only passively pay up.
2. Short the far-month futures contract, long the near-month xyz contract, close before the roll
This trade was basically the inverse of Strategy 1, betting on market over-arbitrage. This strategy did pay off after April 1st.

3. Short the xyz contract funding rate on Boros before the roll
Boros is a market specifically developed by the Pendle team for trading rates (fees). In Boros's crude oil contract market, what is traded is the funding rate expectation of the Trade.xyz crude oil contract for the upcoming period. If a user believes the negative funding rate will continue to deepen, they can short the market's funding rate contract.
However, constrained by slippage costs, position limits, trading fees, and very low capital efficiency (supporting only 0.2x leverage), this trade also struggles to achieve the desired high returns.
Conclusion
Trade.xyz and similar RWA trading platforms are forcing a group of "crypto traders" into becoming "futures traders." DeFi players are also starting to learn CME's roll calendar, calculate price spreads between front and back months, and watch the rate curve on Boros to make decisions.
As trading platforms continue to iterate, market participants are also adapting to the new infrastructure.
You may also like

ZachXBT: Humanity private key leak and abnormal surge in H token should be viewed separately
On June 9, according to related disclosures, on-chain investigator ZachXBT posted an update on Humanity’s roughly $31 million security incident, saying that after further analyzing fund flows, he currently tends to believe the project team was not involved in an “inside job” or a self-staged attack. According to him, the official explanation about the private key leak was broadly accurate, but before the token unlock, the price of H had been artificially pushed higher, and the hacker later took advantage of that market environment; therefore, the private key leak and the earlier abnormal price pumping should be regarded as two separate and independent events. This reframing has shifted the market’s understanding of the nature of the incident. Earlier discussion around Humanity had focused on whether the team directly participated in the attack or used the security incident to cover up internal operations. ZachXBT’s latest remarks shift the focus from “whether it was self-theft” to “whether there were pre-unlock market structure issues.” He also questioned whether the team may have.

Morning Report | OpenAI has submitted an S-1 registration statement draft to the U.S. SEC; Morpho completes $175 million financing

Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle

Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."

$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage

Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.

Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.

White House Discusses CLARITY Act With Law Enforcement Ahead of Senate Vote
The White House discussed the CLARITY Act with law enforcement ahead of a Senate vote, focusing on illicit finance risks and developer protections.

Bitcoin Trading Guide 2026: Strategies for Experienced Traders

What Is XAUT and PAXG? Why Tokenized Gold Is Booming in 2026

Will the SpaceX IPO Hurt Bitcoin? Here's What Traders Are Watching

Foreign selling in the South Korean stock market accelerates, with cumulative net sales reportedly reaching $75 billion this year
On June 9, The Kobeissi Letter, citing Goldman Sachs data, reported that global investors are selling South Korean stocks at an unusually rapid pace. In the latest trading session, foreign investors sold about $801 million worth of Kospi constituent stocks again; total foreign outflows last week reached about $10 billion, and the market has been in net foreign selling on nearly every trading day over the past month. According to the data cited in the report, foreign investors have sold about $75 billion worth of South Korean stocks so far this year. Meanwhile, South Korean retail and institutional investors together recorded roughly $69 billion in net buying over the same period, suggesting that the market’s main buying support has come from domestic capital rather than returning overseas funds. The information currently disclosed still mainly comes from The Kobeissi Letter’s retelling and Goldman Sachs data summaries, while public details on the statistical period and the specific definition of “selling” remain relatively limited.

Fortune Warns of Strategy’s Financing Structure Risks as Bitcoin Premium Narrows
Fortune warned that Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model faces growing financing risks as MSTR’s net asset premium narrows and preferred stock dividend pressure increases.

Ferrari Challenge Le Mans: Carl Moon to Dominate in WEEX Livery

Sahara AI Responds to SAHARA’s Sharp Drop: No Contract or Product Security Issues Found, Internal Investigation Underway
Sahara AI responded to SAHARA’s 60% price drop, saying no token contract or product security issues have been found and an internal investigation is underway.

WEEX Deposit/Withdrawal Dynamic Island: Your Asset Status, Always in Sight

Scaling Crypto Derivatives: The Digital Asset Infrastructure Behind High-Volume Trading
In the fast-moving digital asset ecosystem, derivatives platforms face an extreme architectural test. High-leverage futures markets demand more than just standard security—they require absolute operational precision, zero-latency matching engines, and ironclad structural scalability, all while navigating intense market volatility.
As global platforms scale to meet these demands, the industry is shifting away from rigid, monolithic setups toward a more agile, "decoupled" infrastructure philosophy.
The Blueprint for High-Volume Copy TradingFor elite global exchanges like WEEX (founded in 2018), this architectural choice becomes critical when scaling high-volume retail features like social copy trading. When thousands of users automatically mirror the real-time strategies of elite traders simultaneously, it triggers sudden, monumental spikes in concurrent transactional volume.
To prevent execution latency or settlement bottlenecks during these peak volatility events, a platform's primary engine must remain entirely dedicated to risk management, copy-trade synchronization, and order matching.
The Architectural Rule: New-generation platforms must separate front-end user execution engines from heavy backend infrastructural overhead to eliminate operational friction.
By separating these layers, platforms can maintain complete sovereignty over their trading environments and user experiences while strategically aligning with institutional-grade infrastructure ecosystems. This strategic framework allows modern exchanges to leverage advanced Digital Asset Custody infrastructure such as Cobo’s behind the scenes, ensuring that backend wallet management scales elastically alongside trading spikes.
Capitalizing on Market Momentum and 400× LeverageIn a derivatives arena where platforms offer up to 400× leverage on perpetual contracts, capital efficiency and market agility are core business metrics. To capture market momentum, an exchange needs the ability to rapidly expand its asset offerings, supporting everything from legacy crypto assets to sudden, trending altcoins across a massive library of trading pairs.
Adopting a flexible, scalable Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS) solution such as Cobo’s could completely rewrite the development timeline for high-growth exchanges. Instead of spending months of engineering capital building out custom backend wallet architectures for every new blockchain network, platforms can deploy localized infrastructure in days.
This agility allows platforms to instantly scale their listings to over a thousand trading pairs without compromising security or delaying time-to-market. It mirrors the exact operational advantages seen during high-velocity market events, similar to how advanced wallet infrastructure empowers platforms during sudden asset surges; allowing exchanges to pass that speed and liquidity directly to their global user base.
A Mature Foundation for GrowthThe synergy between trusted infrastructure ecosystems and global trading platforms represents the natural evolution of a maturing crypto market. As WEEX continues to scale its global spot and derivatives offerings for over 6 million users, adopting robust backend paradigms proves that platforms no longer have to compromise between cutting-edge trading velocity and uncompromised structural security.
ZachXBT: Humanity private key leak and abnormal surge in H token should be viewed separately
On June 9, according to related disclosures, on-chain investigator ZachXBT posted an update on Humanity’s roughly $31 million security incident, saying that after further analyzing fund flows, he currently tends to believe the project team was not involved in an “inside job” or a self-staged attack. According to him, the official explanation about the private key leak was broadly accurate, but before the token unlock, the price of H had been artificially pushed higher, and the hacker later took advantage of that market environment; therefore, the private key leak and the earlier abnormal price pumping should be regarded as two separate and independent events. This reframing has shifted the market’s understanding of the nature of the incident. Earlier discussion around Humanity had focused on whether the team directly participated in the attack or used the security incident to cover up internal operations. ZachXBT’s latest remarks shift the focus from “whether it was self-theft” to “whether there were pre-unlock market structure issues.” He also questioned whether the team may have.

