How to Build a High-Performance Blockchain

By: blockbeats|2025/04/22 17:30:02
0
Share
copy

How to Build a High-Performance Blockchain

Source: Aptos Labs

Since the advent of computing technology, engineers and researchers have been continuously exploring how to push computing resources to the performance limit, aiming to maximize efficiency while minimizing the latency of computing tasks. The two pillars of high performance and low latency have always shaped the development of computer science, influencing a wide range of fields from CPUs, FPGAs, and database systems to more recent artificial intelligence infrastructure and blockchain systems. In the pursuit of high performance, pipeline technology has become an indispensable tool. Since the introduction of pipeline technology in the IBM System/360 in 1964 [1], it has been a core of high-performance system design, driving key discussions and innovations in the field.

Pipeline technology is not only applied to hardware but also widely used in the database field. For example, Jim Gray introduced the pipeline parallelism approach in his work "High-Performance Database Systems" [2]. This method breaks down complex database queries into multiple stages and runs them simultaneously, thus improving efficiency and performance. Pipeline technology is equally vital in the field of artificial intelligence, especially in widely used deep learning frameworks like TensorFlow. It utilizes data pipeline parallelism to process data preprocessing and loading, ensuring a smooth flow of data for training and inference, making AI workflows faster and more efficient [3].

Blockchain is no exception. Its core function is similar to a database, handling transactions and updating the state, but it adds the challenge of Byzantine fault-tolerant consensus. The key to improving blockchain throughput (transactions per second) and reducing latency (time to finality) lies in optimizing the different stages—ordering, execution, submission, and transaction synchronization—during interactions under high loads. This challenge is particularly crucial in high-throughput scenarios where traditional designs struggle to maintain low latency.

To explore these concepts, let's consider a familiar analogy: the automobile factory. Understanding how the assembly line has revolutionized manufacturing can help us grasp the evolution of the blockchain pipeline—and why next-generation designs like Zaptos [8] are pushing blockchain performance to new heights.

From Automobile Factory to Blockchain

Imagine you are the owner of an automobile factory with two main goals:

· Maximize throughput: Assemble as many cars as possible every day.

· Minimize latency: Reduce the build time of each car.

Now, consider three types of factories:

Simple Factory

In a simple factory, a group of versatile workers systematically assembles a car. One worker assembles the engine, the next worker installs the wheels, and so on—producing only one car at a time.

The issue? Some workers often wait idle, leading to an overall low production efficiency because no one is working on different parts of the same car simultaneously.

Ford Factory

Enter the Ford assembly line[4]! Here, each worker focuses on a single task. The car moves along a conveyor belt, and as each car passes through, a dedicated worker adds their part.

The result? Multiple cars are at different assembly stages simultaneously, and all workers are busy. Throughput increases significantly—but each car still needs to go through each worker sequentially, meaning the delay per car remains the same.

Magic Factory

Imagine a magic factory where all workers can work on a single car simultaneously! No longer needing to move the car from one station to the next, each part of the car is built simultaneously.

The outcome? The car is assembled at a record speed, with every step happening in sync. This is the ideal scenario to address throughput and latency issues.

Alright, enough about car factories—what about blockchain? As it turns out, designing a high-performance blockchain is not so different from optimizing an assembly line.

Blockchain as a Car Factory

In blockchain, processing a block is akin to assembling a car. The analogy goes as follows:

· Worker = Validator Resource

· Car = One Block

· Assembly Task = Consensus, Execution, and Submission stages

Just as in a simple factory where only one car is processed at a time, if a blockchain were to handle only one block at a time, it would result in underutilization of resources. In contrast, modern blockchain designs aim to emulate the Ford assembly line—processing multiple blocks in different stages simultaneously. This is where pipeline technology shines.

Evolution of Blockchain Pipelines

Traditional Architecture: Sequential Blockchain

Imagine a blockchain that processes blocks sequentially. Validators need to:

1. Receive block proposals.

2. Execute blocks to update the blockchain state.

3. Proceed with achieving consensus on that state.

4. Persist the state to the database.

5. Initiate the consensus for the next block.

Where is the problem?

· Execution and submission are in the critical path of the consensus process.

· Each consensus instance needs to wait for the previous one to complete before starting.

This setup is akin to factories of the pre-Ford era: workers (resources) often idle as they focus on only one block (car) at a time. Unfortunately, many existing blockchains still fall into this category, leading to low throughput and high latency.

Aptos: Parallelizing Performance

Diem introduced a pipeline architecture that decouples execution and submission from the consensus phase, with the consensus phase itself also adopting a pipeline design.

· Asynchronous Execution and Submission [5]: Validators first agree on a block, then execute the block based on the parent block's state. Once validated by a quorum of validators, the state is persisted to storage.

· Pipeline Consensus (Jolteon[6]): New consensus instances can start before the previous one completes, akin to a moving assembly line.

This enhancement allows different blocks to be in different stages simultaneously, increasing throughput and significantly reducing block times to just 2 message delays. However, Jolteon's leader-based design may lead to bottlenecks as the leader can become overloaded during transaction dissemination.

Aptos further optimizes the pipeline through Quorum Store[7], a mechanism that decouples data distribution from consensus. Quorum Store no longer relies on a single leader to broadcast large data blocks in the consensus protocol but separates data distribution from metadata ordering, allowing validators to asynchronously and concurrently distribute data. This design leverages the total bandwidth of all validators, effectively eliminating leader bottlenecks in consensus.

Visualization: How Quorum Store balances resource utilization in leader-based consensus protocols.

Thus far, the Aptos blockchain has built the "Ford Factory" of blockchains. Just as Ford's assembly line revolutionized car manufacturing—different cars in different stages simultaneously—Aptos processes different blocks in different stages concurrently. Each validator's resources are fully utilized, ensuring no part of the process remains idle. This clever arrangement has led to a high-throughput system, making Aptos a robust platform for efficiently and scalably handling blockchain transactions.

Illustration: Pipelined Processing of Sequential Blocks in the Aptos Blockchain. Validators can pipeline process different stages of sequential blocks to maximize resource utilization and increase throughput.

While throughput is crucial, end-to-end latency—the time from transaction submission to final confirmation—is equally important. For applications such as payments, decentralized finance (DeFi), and gaming, every millisecond counts. Many users have experienced delays during high-traffic events because each transaction must sequentially pass through a series of stages: client-full node-validator communication, consensus, execution, state validation, submission, and full node synchronization. Under high load, stages like execution and full node synchronization introduce additional latency.

Illustration: Pipeline Architecture of the Aptos Blockchain. The diagram shows client Ci, full node Fi, and validator Vi. Each box represents a stage a transaction block in the blockchain must go through from left to right. The pipeline consists of five stages: consensus (including dissemination and ordering), execution, validation, submission, and full node synchronization.

It's like a Ford factory: while the assembly line maximizes overall throughput, each car still needs to pass through each worker sequentially, resulting in longer completion times. To truly push blockchain performance to the limit, we need to build a "magic factory" where these stages run in parallel.

Zaptos: Towards Optimal Blockchain Latency

Zaptos[8] further reduces latency through three key optimizations without sacrificing throughput.

· Optimistic Execution: Reducing pipeline latency by starting execution immediately upon receiving a block proposal. Validators promptly add the block to the pipeline and speculatively execute after the parent block completes. Full nodes, upon receiving the proposal from the validator, also perform optimistic execution to validate the state proof.

· Optimistic Submission: Writing state to storage immediately after block execution—even before state validation. When validators eventually validate the state, only minimal updates are needed to complete the submission. If a block ultimately remains unsorted, its optimistically submitted state is rolled back for consistency.

· Fast Verification: Validators expedite verification by concurrently sending validation messages at the final consensus round, starting early verification of the executed block's state without waiting for consensus completion. This optimization significantly reduces pipeline latency by one round in common scenarios.

Illustration: Parallel Pipeline Architecture of Zaptos. Stages other than consensus are effectively hidden within the consensus stage, reducing end-to-end latency.

Through these optimizations, Zaptos effectively hides the latency of other pipeline stages within the consensus stage. Thus, if a blockchain adopts an optimal latency consensus protocol, the overall blockchain latency can also reach an optimum!

Talk is Cheap, Show Me the Data

We evaluated Zaptos' end-to-end performance through geographically distributed experiments, with Aptos as the high-performance baseline. For more details, refer to the paper [8].

On Google Cloud, we simulated a globally decentralized network consisting of 100 validators and 30 full nodes distributed across 10 regions, using commercial-grade machines similar to Aptos deployment.

Throughput-Latency

Figure: Common performance characteristics of Zaptos and Aptos blockchains.

The above figure compares the relationship between end-to-end latency and throughput of the two systems. Both exhibit a gradual latency increase as the load increases, with sharp spikes at maximum capacity, but Zaptos consistently demonstrates more stable latency before reaching peak throughput, reducing latency by 160 milliseconds under low load and over 500 milliseconds under high load.

Impressively, Zaptos achieves sub-second latency at 20k TPS in a production-level mainnet environment—this breakthrough makes real-world applications requiring speed and scalability a possibility.

Latency Breakdown

Figure: Latency breakdown of the Aptos blockchain.

Figure: Latency breakdown of Zaptos.

The latency breakdown charts detail the duration of each stage for validators and full nodes in the pipeline. Key insights include:

· Up to 10k TPS: Zaptos' overall latency is nearly equivalent to its consensus latency, as optimistic execution, authentication, and optimistic commit stages are effectively "hidden" within the consensus stage.

· Above 10k TPS: Due to increased optimistic execution and full node synchronization time, non-consensus stages become more significant. Nevertheless, Zaptos significantly reduces overall latency by overlapping most stages. For example, at 20k TPS, the baseline total latency is 1.32 seconds (consensus 0.68 seconds, other stages 0.64 seconds), while Zaptos is 0.78 seconds (consensus 0.67 seconds, other stages 0.11 seconds).

Conclusion

The evolution of blockchain architecture parallels the transformation in manufacturing—from simple sequential workflows to highly parallelized assembly lines. Aptos's assembly line approach has significantly increased throughput, while Zaptos goes further, reducing latency to sub-second levels, all while maintaining high TPS. Just as modern computing architectures leverage parallelism to maximize efficiency, blockchain must continuously optimize its design to eliminate unnecessary delays. By comprehensively optimizing the blockchain pipeline to achieve minimal latency, Zaptos paves the way for real-world blockchain applications that require speed and scalability.

References

[1] Gene M. Amdahl, Gerrit A. Blaauw, and Frederick P. Brooks. 1964. "Architecture of the IBM System/360." IBM Journal of Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.82.0087

[2] David DeWitt, and Jim Gray. 1992. "Parallel Database Systems: The Future of High Performance Database Systems." Communications of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/129888.129894

[3] Martín Abadi, Paul Barham, Jianmin Chen, Zhifeng Chen, Andy Davis, Jeffrey Dean, Matthieu Devin et al. 2016. "TensorFlow: a System for Large-Scale Machine Learning." In 12th USENIX symposium on operating systems design and implementation (OSDI). https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.08695

[4] The Moving Assembly Line and the Five-Dollar Workday. https://corporate.ford.com/articles/history/moving-assembly-line.html

[5] Zekun Li, and Yu Xia. 2021. DIP-213 - Decoupled Execution. https://github.com/diem/dip/blob/7dc44ee57bb7efe76559f05dcc6851d97e2d3149/dips/dip-213.md

[6] Rati Gelashvili, Lefteris Kokoris-Kogias, Alberto Sonnino, Alexander Spiegelman, and Zhuolun Xiang. 2022. "Jolteon and Ditto: Network-Adaptive Efficient Consensus with Asynchronous Fallback." In International conference on financial cryptography and data security (FC). https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.10362

[7] Quorum Store: How Consensus Horizontally Scales on the Aptos Blockchain. https://medium.com/aptoslabs/quorum-store-how-consensus-horizontally-scales-on-the-aptos-blockchain-988866f6d5b0

[8] Zhuolun Xiang, Zekun Li, Balaji Arun, Teng Zhang, and Alexander Spiegelman. 202 2025. "Zaptos: Towards Optimal Blockchain Latency." arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.10612. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.10612

This article is from a submission and does not represent the views of BlockBeats.

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more