Federal Reserve's 'Taper Tantrum 2.0' Ends, Bank Relaxation on Cryptocurrency Market - What Does It Mean?

By: blockbeats|2025/04/25 18:15:03
0
Share
copy

On April 25, the Federal Reserve announced a major decision: to revoke the 2022 regulatory guidance on bank cryptocurrency and USD stablecoin activities, repeal the 2023 related "Supervisory Guidance on Stablecoin Activities" program, and withdraw from the prior joint statement with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) regarding the risks associated with cryptocurrency activities.

Choke Point 2.0: The Suffocation of the Marginalized Crypto Industry

"Choke Point 2.0" is the crypto industry's term for a series of banking regulatory policies during the Biden administration. This term is derived from the Obama era's "Operation Choke Point," which referred to using pressure on banks to cut off financial services to specific industries to achieve regulatory goals.

Federal Reserve's 'Taper Tantrum 2.0' Ends, Bank Relaxation on Cryptocurrency Market - What Does It Mean?

In the crypto market, Choke Point 2.0 generally refers to the period from 2022 to 2023 when the major U.S. financial regulatory agencies — the Federal Reserve, FDIC, and OCC — strongly discouraged banks from engaging in cryptocurrency-related activities through a series of guidance and policy statements, indirectly limiting the connection between crypto companies and the traditional banking system.

It all began in 2022 when the Federal Reserve issued a regulatory letter requiring state member banks to provide prior notice before engaging in cryptocurrency activities. While this may seem like a procedural requirement, it significantly raised the barrier for banks to enter the crypto space.

By early 2023, the regulatory pressure escalated further. The Federal Reserve, FDIC, and OCC jointly issued a statement explicitly stating that issuing or holding cryptocurrency on public, decentralized networks "is highly likely inconsistent with safe and sound banking practices." That same year, the regulatory agencies also mandated that banks seeking to engage in USD stablecoin activities must obtain prior approval through a "no objection" process from regulators. This process was not only complex and time-consuming but also granted regulators veto power.

As a result, many have referred to this wave of regulatory pressure as "Choke Point 2.0." Formerly of Fidelity Investments and the first crypto asset analyst, Nic Carter, in a deep dive analysis, described this series of actions as "a precise and broad-based assault on the crypto industry through the banking system."

He pointed out that the regulators' goal was to make it harder for banks to serve the crypto industry, severing the connection between crypto businesses and the fiat system. This not only restricted crypto companies' account opening and payment channels but also severely impacted the fiat on/off ramps for stablecoin issuers and exchanges. Some crypto companies even faced the risk of "losing banking services altogether," threatening stablecoin liquidity and exchange operations.

Related Reading: "In-Depth Analysis of 'Debanking': The Triple Game of Compliance, Risk, and Politics"

、"US Launches 'Deplatforming Action'? Plans to Marginalize the Crypto Industry"

FTX Collapse: The Catalyst of Regulatory Pressure

The Deplatforming Action 2.0 and the November 2022 FTX Exchange collapse are inseparable. The FTX collapse resulted in customers losing billions of dollars, causing market confidence to hit rock bottom. The cryptocurrency credit crisis of 2022 did not have a significant impact on traditional finance, but regulatory authorities clearly wanted to take preemptive action. As a result, the regulatory system restricted the interaction between banks and the crypto industry to prevent risks from affecting the banking system.

Crypto-friendly banks naturally became the primary targets of regulation. Silvergate and Signature were among the few banks willing to serve crypto customers, and they faced immense pressure. In December 2022, Senators Elizabeth Warren, John Kennedy, and Roger Marshall jointly wrote to Silvergate, criticizing its failure to detect suspicious activities related to FTX and its affiliate company Alameda Research.

Subsequently, Silvergate experienced a run on the bank following the FTX collapse, with its stock price plummeting from a high of $160 in March 2022 to $11.55 in January 2023. Signature announced a reduction of its crypto deposits from $23 billion to $10 billion and a complete exit from the stablecoin business. Another bank serving crypto customers, Metropolitan Commercial, also announced the closure of its crypto operations in January 2023.

Trump Administration's Shift in Banking Regulation Direction

By 2025, as Trump returned to the White House, a significant change occurred in the U.S. crypto regulatory environment. On March 7, the White House held its first cryptocurrency summit, and the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) released a series of interpretive letters, allowing national banks to offer cryptocurrency custody, stablecoin reserves, blockchain node participation, and other services without requiring special approval. This overturned the restrictive guidance from the Biden administration, revoking Interpretive Letter 1179 from 2021.

OCC Acting Comptroller Hood stated, "Digital assets should and must also become part of the U.S. economy." The new policy permits banks to securely store private keys for customers, hold stablecoin reserves pegged 1:1 to the U.S. dollar, and participate as nodes in validating blockchain transactions, providing flexibility for banks to deeply engage in the digital asset space.

The OCC's shift may be closely tied to Trump's commitment. During this year's White House cryptocurrency summit, Trump stated, "Some people are suffering greatly, and what they're doing is ridiculous... It will all end very soon." He criticized Operation Choke Point 2.0 for "forcing banks to shut down cryptocurrency business accounts, weaponizing the government against the entire industry."

On April 17, Powell further clarified the direction of regulatory relaxation during a speech at the Economic Club of Chicago, believing that there is "room for relaxation" in the current cryptocurrency regulatory policies for banking institutions. He acknowledged the recent mainstream trend of cryptocurrency, noting that regulatory agencies were cautious due to "a series of fraud and scam events," but the market has fundamentally changed, necessitating a clear regulatory framework for stablecoins and sending a signal supporting innovation.

Related Reading: "Fed Chair Powell Discusses Cryptocurrency – What Positive Signals Did He Send to the Industry?"

Today, the Federal Reserve officially rescinded the guidelines related to Operation Choke Point 2.0. Banks no longer need to report cryptocurrency-related businesses, and such activities will be monitored through regular supervisory processes. In alignment with the Trump administration's pledge to abolish the "exclusion of cryptocurrency companies from banking services" policy, investigations by the House Oversight Committee and disclosures from the FDIC have also promoted policy transparency.

The Next Regulatory Boost for the Crypto Market?

Since 2025, there has been a continuous stream of bullish news for the crypto market. Following the SEC's approval of a slew of altcoin ETF applications, the return of traditional crypto market makers, the repeal of the DeFi broker rule, the dismissal of a series of crypto-related lawsuits, and Trump's personal appointment of a new pro-crypto SEC chair, the market has now received positive news on the banking regulatory front. The Federal Reserve's announcement of the repeal of Operation Choke Point 2.0 signifies the end of a three-year era of high-pressure regulation on banking interactions with the crypto market.

The most direct impact of this positive development is a significant reduction in the barriers for banks to serve the crypto industry, a substantial decrease in legal risks, and the potential for more banks to offer accounts, payment, and custodial services to crypto businesses. Additionally, fiat channels for stablecoin issuers and exchanges are expected to become more seamless as a result.

More importantly, the Trump administration has prioritized crypto-friendly policies, and Powell's affirmation of a stablecoin regulatory framework has injected clear expectations into the market. These intensive bullish signals may further attract more traditional financial institutions into the market, boosting market liquidity and bolstering investor confidence.

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more