DeFi Market Breathes a Sigh of Relief: Trump Administration Kicks Off Regulatory Loosening

By: blockbeats|2025/04/14 12:15:03
0
Share
copy
Original Article Title: How Big Is Trump's IRS Rule Reversal Crypto Win?
Original Article Author: Token Dispatch, Prathik Desai
Original Article Translation: Block Unicorn

U.S. President Donald Trump signed a resolution last Thursday overturning the Internal Revenue Service's (IRS) controversial decentralized finance (DeFi) broker reporting rule, marking his first crypto victory. This also became the first crypto-related bill ever signed by a U.S. president. After years of regulatory uncertainty, the crypto industry finally has concrete evidence that Washington is listening.

The resolution passed with impressive bipartisan support, with the Senate voting 70-28 and the House voting 292-132, indicating that crypto may finally be transcending political divides.

This reversal is not just about undoing a problematic tax rule; it could be a precursor to determining how the decentralized finance ecosystem evolves in the world's largest economy.

In this article, we will take you through the origins of the DeFi broker rule, the significance of its repeal, and most importantly, how it will set the stage for a new crypto regulatory approach under the Trump 2.0 administration.

Biden's Parting "Gift"

On December 27, 2024, the Biden administration finalized a controversial IRS rule in the last few weeks, requiring "DeFi brokers" to collect and report user transaction information — this was the final strike against crypto innovation before the government transition.

The rule expanded the definition of "broker" from the 2021 Infrastructure Bill to include DeFi platforms, requiring them to issue 1099 forms to users and report transaction details to the IRS, with the rule originally set to take effect on January 1, 2027.

This sent shockwaves through the industry, prompting a backlash.

Why? Seven words: Technically impossible to comply with, a triggering factor.

The Biden administration specifically targeted "front-end service providers." Think of MetaMask or Uniswap interfaces, used by millions to swap tokens — these intuitive interfaces enable ordinary users to access decentralized protocols.

According to this rule, these front-end entities need to collect name, address, phone number, and transaction details — information that they cannot access in a truly decentralized ecosystem.

When faced with criticism of this contradiction, the tax authority responded with a perfunctory statement:

“Individuals with technical expertise engaging in financial services-related trades or businesses must adhere to the same rules as other financial services business operators.”

This exposes a profound misunderstanding of how decentralized systems operate. Industry leaders have described this as an “irreconcilable contradiction” — demanding that entities collect information they cannot even access.

This means platforms either have to redesign protocols to collect information that goes against user privacy and the core principles of decentralization, or completely exit the U.S. market.

The Biden Treasury Department’s last-minute extension of the rule to DeFi was seen as an unauthorized executive overreach.

Former AI and Crypto Czar under Trump, David Sacks, bluntly referred to it as a “midnight regulation,” stating that it “will smother American innovation, raise privacy concerns, and impose unprecedented compliance burdens on American DeFi companies.”

DeFi Market Breathes a Sigh of Relief: Trump Administration Kicks Off Regulatory Loosening

Turning Point

The significance of repealing this rule goes far beyond minor tweaks to tax policy.

Under the Congressional Review Act that Congress used to repeal the rule, the IRS cannot issue a “substantially similar” rule without new congressional authorization. This not only halted the rule but created breathing room for developers and entrepreneurs who can now proceed with more certainty.

The resolution’s passage signifies that the crypto industry has finally achieved a long-sought goal: significant political capital in Washington.

Want more good news? This may just be the beginning. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stated at a recent White House summit on digital assets plans to “revoke and amend” related crypto tax rules.

Bipartisan and Industry Support

A key feature of this reversal is its bipartisan nature.

When Republicans and dozens of Democrats joined forces to overturn the rule of a Democratic administration, it revealed a shift in the political relevance of cryptocurrency and the notion that financial technology innovation deserves room to grow.

This marks a significant shift from the era of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under Gary Gensler's leadership, during which the Democratic Party leadership largely supported aggressive enforcement actions against crypto companies.

Even Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer broke ranks with the party leadership to support this measure, a political calculation that fully illustrates the increasing importance of cryptocurrency in elections.

Industry groups that were once hard to get recognition for have now become influential voices.

The Blockchain Association and DeFi Education Fund led proactive lobbying efforts, successfully reversing the Democratic Party's voting situation, ultimately garnering a majority of votes to overturn the veto. Their success demonstrates that cryptocurrency advocacy has rapidly matured, with their outreach to key legislators being very mature, focusing on specific policy issues rather than generic blockchain education.

When the Biden administration rolled out the rule, the Blockchain Association pledged to take "aggressive action." They did indeed deliver on that promise.

Now, four months after filing the lawsuit, the association is celebrating the repeal of the rule that threatened to end the US crypto industry.

Importantly, despite some influential Democrats opposing it, arguing that the resolution could lead to tax evasion, this victory has still been achieved.

Massachusetts Democratic Congressman Richard Neal had warned that this move could lead to the government losing $40 billion in tax revenue. This revenue estimate could be from unreported capital gains, and as crypto advocates push for further regulatory easing, this will remain a point of contention.

Global Positioning

The signing of this resolution has significantly altered the United States' position in the global competition for crypto dominance.

The contrast is stark. Just a few months ago, due to regulatory uncertainty, crypto companies were abandoning the US market.

Coinbase had prepared contingency plans to move overseas. Now, the Trump 2.0 government positioning the US as the "Crypto Capital of the World" campaign promise seems to be coming into effect.

With the surge in global investment in DeFi—approximately $900 billion currently locked in protocols according to DeFiLlama—countries that create a friendly regulatory environment will reap significant economic benefits: high-skill job opportunities, legitimate tax revenue from operations, and technological leadership.

This resolution also sent a strong signal to regions and countries like Hong Kong, the UAE, and Japan positioning themselves as crypto-friendly alternatives.

For global crypto entrepreneurs and investors, Thursday's signing delivered a clear message: the U.S. is open for business.

The Middle Way

The resolution sparked a legitimate debate about the balance between innovation and tax compliance.

Critics, such as Texas Democratic Congressman Lloyd Doggett, argue that repealing the rule would create exploitable loopholes for wealthy investors.

This concern is not entirely unfounded.

The decentralized nature of DeFi protocols means that transactions occur without the record-keeping of traditional intermediaries. While the blockchain itself is transparent, associating wallet addresses with taxpayers is still challenging. Without some form of reporting mechanism, tax compliance heavily relies on voluntary disclosure.

Some policy experts have proposed a compromise – creating optional compliance frameworks that require certain disclosures in exchange for regulatory clarity. This "safe harbor" approach would allow DeFi protocols to operate legally while gradually introducing appropriate safeguards.

Our Take

Trump's signing of this resolution represents a breakthrough in addressing the core contradiction of crypto regulation, a contradiction that has plagued the industry from day one: the collision of an industrial-age regulatory framework with a digital-native financial system.

This victory demonstrates that Washington has finally recognized that forcing decentralized systems to fit within a centralized regulatory framework is a non-starter. Innovation needs appropriate guardrails, not retrofitted roadblocks.

This moment unveils a deeper layer of the U.S. regulatory philosophy. For decades, U.S. financial regulation has followed a pattern: innovation occurs, issues arise, regulation responds. The DeFi broker-dealer rules attempted pre-emptive regulation before fully understanding the natural evolution of the technology. Its failure shows that the U.S. is reverting to its traditional strength – allowing innovation to flourish while addressing specific issues as they arise.

Celebration should be tempered with pragmatism. The crypto industry faces a critical test of its credibility. Having now gained some regulatory breathing room, it must deliver real-world benefits beyond trader profits. Can DeFi significantly improve financial access? Will it lower transaction costs for everyday users? Can it create more efficient markets benefiting a broader economy?

The bipartisan nature of this victory is both an opportunity and a warning. While crypto has transcended partisan divides today, its support still hinges on demonstrating real-world utility. If the industry cannot move beyond speculation to solve actual problems, today's allies could become tomorrow's critics.

For global competitors who thought the U.S. had abandoned its leadership in digital asset innovation, this reversal is a wake-up call. The U.S. possesses unparalleled capital markets, technical talent, and regulatory flexibility—when these factors align, they create a powerful competitive advantage.

The road ahead remains challenging. The SEC's oversight of tokens, the CFTC's jurisdiction over derivatives, banks' concerns over stablecoins—these issues remain unresolved. However, this decision indicates that, in cases where broad ideological arguments often fall short, focused advocacy on specific technical issues can succeed with careful organization.

The window of innovation is now open. The industry must now collaborate with regulatory bodies to establish a framework that both protects consumers and drives genuine innovation. Thursday's signing indicates that both parties may be finally ready for such conversations.

Original Article Link

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more