Cryptocurrency Asset Valuation Model Exploration

By: blockbeats|2025/04/16 18:15:02
0
Share
copy
Original Title: "Exploring Cryptocurrency Valuation Models"
Original Author: 0xCousin, IOBC Capital

Crypto has become one of the most dynamic and promising sectors in the fintech industry. With numerous institutional funds entering the space, how to properly value Crypto projects has become a key issue. Traditional financial assets have mature valuation systems, such as Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Model, Price/Earnings (P/E) Valuation Method, etc.

Crypto projects are diverse, including public blockchains, CEX platform coins, DeFi projects, meme coins, etc., each with their own characteristics, economic models, and Token utility. It is necessary to explore valuation models that are suitable for each track.

1. Public Blockchains - Metcalfe's Law

Law Analysis

The core content of Metcalfe's Law is that the network's value is proportional to the square of the number of nodes.

V = K*N² (where: V is the network value, N is the number of active nodes, K is a constant)

Metcalfe's Law is widely recognized in the valuation prediction of internet companies. For example, in a study titled "Independent Research on the Value of Facebook and China's Largest Social Network Company Tencent (Zhang et al., 2015)," over a 10-year statistical period, the value of these companies exhibited the characteristics of Metcalfe's Law concerning the number of users.

ETH Example

Metcalfe's Law also applies to the valuation of blockchain public chain projects. Western scholars have found that Ethereum's market capitalization is in a logarithmic linear relationship with daily active users, which basically fits the formula of Metcalfe's Law. However, the Ethereum network's market cap is proportional to the user base by N^(1.43), with a constant K value of 3000. The calculation formula is as follows:

V = 3000 * N^1.43

Statistically, there is some correlation between the Metcalfe's Law valuation method and the ETH market cap trend:

Cryptocurrency Asset Valuation Model Exploration

Logarithmic trend chart:

Limitation Analysis

Metcalfe's Law has limitations when applied to emerging public blockchains. In the early stages of public chain development, the user base is relatively small, making it less suitable for valuation based on Metcalfe's Law, such as early projects like Solana and Tron.

Furthermore, Metcalfe's Law also fails to reflect the impact of staking rates on token prices, the long-term effects of Gas fee burn under the EIP1559 mechanism, and the ecosystem of public chains may engage in games based on the Security Ratio to Total Value Secured (TVS) among other factors.

II. CEX Platform Tokens - Profit Buyback & Burn Model

Model Analysis

Centralized exchange platform tokens are similar to equity tokens and are related to the exchange platform's revenue (transaction fee revenue, listing fees, other financial services, etc.), the development of the public chain ecosystem, and the exchange platform's market share. Platform tokens generally have a buyback and burn mechanism, and may also incorporate the Gas Fee Burn mechanism seen in public chains.

The valuation of platform tokens not only needs to consider the overall platform revenue but also requires discounting future cash flows to estimate the intrinsic value of the platform token. It also needs to consider the token's burn mechanism to measure changes in scarcity. Therefore, the price movement of platform tokens is generally related to the exchange platform's transaction volume growth rate and the platform token's supply reduction rate. A simplified Profit Buyback & Burn Model valuation method calculation is as follows:

Platform Token Value Growth Rate = K * Transaction Volume Growth Rate * Supply Burn Rate (where K is a constant)

BNB Example

BNB is the most classic exchange platform token. Since its inception in 2017, it has received widespread acclaim from investors. BNB's empowerment has gone through two stages:

· Stage One: Profit Buyback - From 2017 to 2020, Binance used 20% of its profits each quarter to buy back and burn BNB tokens;

· Stage Two: Auto-Burn + BEP95 - Starting in 2021, the Auto-Burn mechanism was implemented, no longer based on Binance's profit but on BNB's price and the quarterly block count of the BNB Chain, calculating the burn amount according to a formula. Additionally, there is a real-time burn mechanism called BEP95 (similar to Ethereum's EIP1559). 10% of each block's reward is burned, and as of now, a total of 2,599,141 BNB has been burned through the BEP95 mechanism.

The Auto-Burn mechanism calculates the burn amount based on the following formula:

Where N is the quarterly block production of the BNB Chain, P is the quarterly average price of BNB, and K is a constant (initially set at 1000, adjustable through BEP). Assuming a 40% growth rate in Binance's trading volume in 2024 and a 3.5% burn rate of BNB's supply in 2024, with K set as 10:

BNB Price Growth Rate = 10 * 40% * 3.5% = 14%

This means that based on this data, BNB should increase by 14% in 2024 compared to 2023.

From 2017 to the present, a total of 59.529 million BNB has been burned, with an average quarterly burn of 1.12% of the remaining BNB supply.

Limitation Analysis

When using this valuation method in practice, it is important to closely monitor changes in the market share of the exchange platform. For example, if a certain exchange platform's market share continues to decline, even if its current profitability performance is acceptable, future profit expectations may be affected, thereby reducing the valuation of the platform's token.

Regulatory policy changes also have a significant impact on the valuation of CEX platform tokens, as policy uncertainty may lead to a change in market expectations for platform tokens.

III. DeFi Project — Token Cash Flow Discounted Valuation Method

DeFi projects use the Token Cash Flow Discounted Valuation Method (Discounted Cash Flow, DCF), the core logic of which is to forecast the future cash flow that the token can generate and discount it to its current value at a certain discount rate.

Where FCFt is the free cash flow in year t, r is the discount rate, n is the forecast period, and TV is the Terminal Value. This valuation method determines the current value of a Token by anticipating the future revenue of the DeFi protocol.

Using RAY as an Example

In 2024, Raydium's Revenue was 98.9m. Assuming a yearly growth rate of 10%, a discount rate of 15%, a forecast period of 5 years, perpetual growth rate of 3%, and FCF conversion rate of 90%.

Future Five-Year Cash Flows:

Future Five-Year Discounted FCF Sum: 390.3m

Terminal Value Discounted to 611.6m

DCF Total Valuation = TV + FCF = 611.6m + 390.3m = 1.002B

RAY's current market value is 1.16B, which is quite close to the overall valuation. Of course, this valuation is based on a 10% annual growth rate over the next 5 years. In reality, Raydium is likely to experience negative growth in a bear market and may see a growth rate higher than 10% in a bull market.

Limitation Analysis

The valuation of DeFi protocols faces several challenges:

One is that governance tokens generally do not capture the protocol's revenue value. To avoid being classified as securities by the SEC, they cannot directly distribute dividends. Although there are mitigation methods (staking rewards, buybacks and burns, etc.), DeFi protocols lack the incentive to feed profits back to the token holders;

Two is that predicting future cash flows is extremely difficult due to rapid market shifts between bullish and bearish conditions, significant cash flow fluctuations for DeFi protocols, and unpredictable competitor and user behaviors;

Three is the complexity in determining the discount rate, which requires a comprehensive consideration of market risks, project risks, and other factors. The choice of different discount rates can have a significant impact on the valuation results;

Four is that some DeFi projects implement profit buyback and burn mechanisms. The implementation of such mechanisms can affect token circulation and value. DeFi tokens with such mechanisms may not be suitable for valuation using discounted cash flow methods.

IV. Bitcoin—Comprehensive Consideration of Multiples Valuation Method

Mining Cost Valuation Method

Statistics show that in the past five years, Bitcoin's price has been lower than the mainstream mining machine's mining cost only about 10% of the time. This fully illustrates the crucial role of mining cost in supporting Bitcoin's price. Therefore, Bitcoin's mining cost can be viewed as the lower limit of Bitcoin's price. Bitcoin's price has only been below the mainstream mining machine's mining cost for a small portion of time, and historically, these have been excellent investment opportunities.

Gold Equivalent Model

Bitcoin is often seen as "digital gold," capable of replacing some of gold's "store of value" function. Currently, Bitcoin's market cap represents 7.3% of the gold market cap. If this ratio were to increase to 10%, 15%, 33%, 100%, the corresponding Bitcoin prices would reach $92,523, $138,784, $305,325, $925,226, respectively. This model is based on the analogy of their store of value properties, providing a macroscopic reference for Bitcoin valuation.

However, Bitcoin and gold still have many differences in terms of physical properties, market recognition, use cases, etc. Gold has become a globally recognized safe-haven asset over thousands of years, with widespread industrial use and physical backing; whereas Bitcoin is a virtual asset based on blockchain technology, with its value stemming more from market consensus and technological innovation. Therefore, when applying this model, it is necessary to fully consider the impact of these differences on Bitcoin's actual value.

Summary

This article aims to advocate for finding valuation models for crypto projects to promote the sustainable development of valuable projects in the industry and attract more institutional investors to allocate to crypto assets.

Especially in bear markets, when the tide recedes, we must use the strictest standards and the simplest logic to find projects with long-term value. Through a reasonable valuation model, just like capturing the "burst of the bubble" Google, Apple in 2000, digging out the "Google, Apple" of the Crypto field in a bear market.

Original Article Link

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more