a16z partner: perpetual contracts are rewriting the global trading rules
Author: jay
Compiled by: Jiahua, ChainCatcher
Perpetual contracts ("perps") refer to futures contracts that never settle. As a native innovation in cryptocurrency, they experienced a surge in 2025 on-chain. Today, they have become one of the largest markets in the crypto space, encompassing traditional assets with trading volumes reaching trillions of dollars.
Last year, the trading volume of perpetual contracts settled by top centralized exchanges reached $86.2 trillion (a year-on-year increase of 47%), while the growth rate of on-chain perpetual contracts was even more astonishing: leading decentralized exchanges (DEXs) reached a trading volume of $6.7 trillion (a year-on-year increase of 346%). Currently, DEX trading volume accounts for about 7.8% of centralized exchange (CEX) trading volume, whereas just over a year ago, this ratio was only around 2.5%. [Note: While a few centralized platforms regulated by the U.S. offer products similar to perpetual contracts to U.S. investors, all centralized and decentralized exchanges restrict U.S. investors from trading actual perpetual contracts.]
More importantly, perpetual contracts are gradually shedding their image as a marginalized crypto primitive and beginning to demonstrate a fundamental transformative power in reshaping trading behavior and market structure.
So, what is driving the popularity of perpetual contracts? Why now? The following content will explore why global traders are increasingly favoring perpetual contracts, the scale opportunities of this market, and where builders see the opportunities.
A Brief History and Evolution of Perpetual Contracts
The idea itself is actually older than the cryptocurrency industry. Theoretically, perpetual contracts existed as early as 1993 when Nobel laureate Robert Shiller proposed perpetual futures contracts, originally conceived as a tool to hedge against real estate value risk. However, it wasn't until 2016, with the rise of BitMEX and XBTUSD (the longest-running Bitcoin perpetual swap contract), that perpetual contracts became popular in the crypto space.
A decade later, modern exchanges now offer perpetual contracts covering stocks, indices, commodities, interest rates, startup valuations, and even the price of Nvidia's H100 GPU.
For years, perpetual contracts have been a billion-dollar revenue engine for centralized exchanges. With the growing demand for leverage from retail investors, perpetual contracts have become the primary venue for short-term price discovery, liquidity, and trading activity—at many large centralized exchanges in Asia, their trading volume is several times that of spot trading.
In the past year and a half, decentralized perpetual contract exchanges have begun to substantially eat into the market share of perpetual contracts held by centralized exchanges. With the structural advantage of self-custody, perpetual DEXs are rapidly closing the gap with CEXs in terms of liquidity, performance, and features aimed at active traders.
With breakthroughs achieved by perpetual DEXs like Hyperliquid, leading crypto wallets and applications have begun to support perpetual contracts and launched high-quality trading experiences, reaching millions of users. In the second half of 2025, the front end of perpetual DEXs experienced explosive growth—ranging from casual mobile applications to complex multi-site trading terminals.
In particular, Hyperliquid, through HIP-3 (Builder-Deployed Perpetuals), has broken the service boundaries that DEXs can offer. This mechanism allows anyone to launch perpetual markets on the exchange without permission. With HIP-3, builders can list almost any asset and earn a 50% fee share while managing their own oracles and risk parameters.
At the same time, new entrants and competitors such as Avantis, Lighter, Ostium, and Variational have emerged or accelerated product development. The increasingly fierce competition has forced perpetual DEXs to differentiate themselves in exchange design, market structure, asset support, and permissionless features, prompting some trading platforms to find strong product-market fit in new categories like real-world asset (RWA) perpetual contracts.
For years, perpetual contract traders have merely speculated on crypto assets—BTC, ETH, SOL, and various long-tail altcoins. However, at the end of last year, when the trading volume of perpetual contracts significantly cooled from recent peaks amid a broader crypto market sell-off, RWA perpetual contracts began to gain traction. A few perpetual DEXs listed commodities, stocks, and stock indices, expanding the range of tradable assets to include private companies like Nvidia, Samsung, and even SpaceX, as well as commodities like silver and palladium.
This year, the growth of RWA perpetual contracts has accelerated. In recent weeks, RWA accounted for as much as 44% of total trading volume on Hyperliquid, and RWA trading pairs have now stabilized as some of the highest fee-generating pairs on the exchange. On Ostium, RWA has dominated the vast majority of trading volume for months.
Decentralized exchanges have also excelled in facilitating price discovery for RWAs like crude oil, especially during weekends when traditional exchanges are closed.
With the rise of RWA perpetual contracts, we see more and more companies beginning to develop products and businesses related to perpetual contracts. In just the past six months, new exchanges, trading interfaces, market deployers, and liquidity providers have emerged.
Players entering this space include entirely new startups, those transitioning to perpetual contracts, and some of the largest global fintech companies integrating perpetual trading into existing products.
All these diverse players converge on the same opportunity: perpetual contracts are poised to become one of the dominant trading tools in the global financial landscape.
Market Opportunities for Perpetual Contracts
Stepping back to examine traditional finance (TradFi), options are one of the largest and most actively traded markets globally. They exist in currencies, stocks, indices, commodities, and ETFs, serving as extremely powerful and expressive tools that allow people to trade based on many different predictions: timing, volatility, price ranges, etc.
However, if we zoom in on retail trading behavior, we find that a significant amount of activity is concentrated in a specific category of options: short-term, leveraged, directional risk exposure. A prominent example is 0DTE (zero-day-to-expiration options)—traders seek high elastic returns on intraday movements at low costs.
This type of trading is one of the fastest-growing categories of options. By 2025, the average daily trading volume of 0DTE SPX (S&P 500 Index) options reached 2.3 million contracts, a year-on-year increase of 51%, accounting for 59% of total SPX options trading volume. In response to this demand, the market has launched several new index products with daily settlements, including CBTX and MBTX Bitcoin ETF index options, as well as options for the equally weighted Cboe Magnificent 10 index.
Thus, despite the many complex uses of options—structured hedging, volatility trading, discrete trading, convexity (the characteristic where your maximum loss is fixed, but potential gains are theoretically unlimited)—the vast and growing flow of retail capital is actually just seeking short-term, leveraged directional exposure. This exposure is precisely what perpetual contracts can perfectly satisfy.
There is a trade-off: options excel at certain risk and convexity returns and remain the default tool for expressing volatility. The most a trader can lose is the premium they paid. However, with perpetual contracts, the entire collateral position can be liquidated. But for most retail traders seeking directional leverage, perpetual contracts have several structural advantages:
- Always online. The latest generation of perpetual markets trades 24/7 without trading time limits or market closures. For a global, crypto-native user base, continuous access is a reasonable expectation.
- No strike price, no expiration date, no rollovers. With a single continuous position, traders do not need to choose parameters, manage expiration dates, or rebuild positions daily or weekly. They can hold for seconds, months, or theoretically even forever.
- Simpler risk exposure. For perpetual contracts, the primary considerations are price, collateral, and liquidation thresholds. In contrast, with options, even if your directional judgment is correct, you may still incur losses due to time decay, changes in implied volatility, and path dependence. Perpetual contracts eliminate these complexities. Trading is a pure expression of directional belief.
- Capital efficiency for continuous exposure. Short-term options require upfront payment of the full premium and repeated rollovers. Perpetual contracts require margin—typically just a small fraction of the nominal value—making them generally more capital efficient for directional positions lasting from intraday to days.
Options will not disappear. They have long been a part of financial history and may retain dominance in a considerable number of trading use cases, especially when involving certain risk and more complex return structures. But for the vast and growing flow of capital seeking Delta-1 directional leverage, perpetual contracts have captured trillions of dollars in trading volume and billions in revenue.
This raises a question: as perpetual contracts transition from niche tools to mainstream trading primitives, at which layer of the tech stack will value be concentrated?
In traditional markets, the most valuable companies are often built on top of exchange infrastructure rather than the exchange layer itself. For example, the market capitalization of retail broker Robinhood is higher than that of its underlying Nasdaq exchange.
Whether this model still holds in the crypto space—whether platforms like Hyperliquid, Lighter, or Ostium can accumulate sufficiently strong network effects at the exchange layer—is one of the most interesting open questions in the field.
Regardless, builder activity is rapidly expanding. We have seen growth among developers in the following areas:
- Customized distribution layers: Vertical or audience-specific front ends that not only present markets but also package narratives, strategies, gamification, or social touchpoints.
- Market makers and operators (e.g., HIP-3 deployers): Operating a popular market on Hyperliquid allows deployers to essentially have a "mini-exchange" without building the most complex exchange infrastructure. Today's deployers may have only scratched the surface of data or price elements that could be "perpetualized" in the future.
- Specialized liquidity provision: Market makers focusing on long-tail markets, event-driven order books, and cross-site inventory management.
- Perpetual-specific data infrastructure: An ecosystem of community-driven dashboards, block explorers, heat maps, and analytical tools has emerged around positions, funding rates, liquidations, trader signals, leverage exposure, and retention groups. More mature, high-quality, real-time data will make the entire ecosystem more transparent and efficient for all participants.
Of course, significant open questions and challenges remain, covering distribution, liquidity depth of new trading platforms, oracle reliability when expanding the range of assets, inevitable extreme events ("10/10" events), and regulation (currently restricting U.S. investors' access to these products). As perpetual contracts "graduate" from the crypto-native bubble to the global financial stage, these are all expected growing pains. As the perpetual contract ecosystem matures, the question is no longer whether perpetual contracts can scale, but rather who will build the most valuable applications and infrastructure around them when they do scale.
You may also like

ZachXBT: Humanity private key leak and abnormal surge in H token should be viewed separately
On June 9, according to related disclosures, on-chain investigator ZachXBT posted an update on Humanity’s roughly $31 million security incident, saying that after further analyzing fund flows, he currently tends to believe the project team was not involved in an “inside job” or a self-staged attack. According to him, the official explanation about the private key leak was broadly accurate, but before the token unlock, the price of H had been artificially pushed higher, and the hacker later took advantage of that market environment; therefore, the private key leak and the earlier abnormal price pumping should be regarded as two separate and independent events. This reframing has shifted the market’s understanding of the nature of the incident. Earlier discussion around Humanity had focused on whether the team directly participated in the attack or used the security incident to cover up internal operations. ZachXBT’s latest remarks shift the focus from “whether it was self-theft” to “whether there were pre-unlock market structure issues.” He also questioned whether the team may have.

Morning Report | OpenAI has submitted an S-1 registration statement draft to the U.S. SEC; Morpho completes $175 million financing

Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle

Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."

$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage

Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.

Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.

White House Discusses CLARITY Act With Law Enforcement Ahead of Senate Vote
The White House discussed the CLARITY Act with law enforcement ahead of a Senate vote, focusing on illicit finance risks and developer protections.

Bitcoin Trading Guide 2026: Strategies for Experienced Traders

What Is XAUT and PAXG? Why Tokenized Gold Is Booming in 2026

Will the SpaceX IPO Hurt Bitcoin? Here's What Traders Are Watching

Foreign selling in the South Korean stock market accelerates, with cumulative net sales reportedly reaching $75 billion this year
On June 9, The Kobeissi Letter, citing Goldman Sachs data, reported that global investors are selling South Korean stocks at an unusually rapid pace. In the latest trading session, foreign investors sold about $801 million worth of Kospi constituent stocks again; total foreign outflows last week reached about $10 billion, and the market has been in net foreign selling on nearly every trading day over the past month. According to the data cited in the report, foreign investors have sold about $75 billion worth of South Korean stocks so far this year. Meanwhile, South Korean retail and institutional investors together recorded roughly $69 billion in net buying over the same period, suggesting that the market’s main buying support has come from domestic capital rather than returning overseas funds. The information currently disclosed still mainly comes from The Kobeissi Letter’s retelling and Goldman Sachs data summaries, while public details on the statistical period and the specific definition of “selling” remain relatively limited.

Fortune Warns of Strategy’s Financing Structure Risks as Bitcoin Premium Narrows
Fortune warned that Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model faces growing financing risks as MSTR’s net asset premium narrows and preferred stock dividend pressure increases.

Ferrari Challenge Le Mans: Carl Moon to Dominate in WEEX Livery

Sahara AI Responds to SAHARA’s Sharp Drop: No Contract or Product Security Issues Found, Internal Investigation Underway
Sahara AI responded to SAHARA’s 60% price drop, saying no token contract or product security issues have been found and an internal investigation is underway.

WEEX Deposit/Withdrawal Dynamic Island: Your Asset Status, Always in Sight

Scaling Crypto Derivatives: The Digital Asset Infrastructure Behind High-Volume Trading
In the fast-moving digital asset ecosystem, derivatives platforms face an extreme architectural test. High-leverage futures markets demand more than just standard security—they require absolute operational precision, zero-latency matching engines, and ironclad structural scalability, all while navigating intense market volatility.
As global platforms scale to meet these demands, the industry is shifting away from rigid, monolithic setups toward a more agile, "decoupled" infrastructure philosophy.
The Blueprint for High-Volume Copy TradingFor elite global exchanges like WEEX (founded in 2018), this architectural choice becomes critical when scaling high-volume retail features like social copy trading. When thousands of users automatically mirror the real-time strategies of elite traders simultaneously, it triggers sudden, monumental spikes in concurrent transactional volume.
To prevent execution latency or settlement bottlenecks during these peak volatility events, a platform's primary engine must remain entirely dedicated to risk management, copy-trade synchronization, and order matching.
The Architectural Rule: New-generation platforms must separate front-end user execution engines from heavy backend infrastructural overhead to eliminate operational friction.
By separating these layers, platforms can maintain complete sovereignty over their trading environments and user experiences while strategically aligning with institutional-grade infrastructure ecosystems. This strategic framework allows modern exchanges to leverage advanced Digital Asset Custody infrastructure such as Cobo’s behind the scenes, ensuring that backend wallet management scales elastically alongside trading spikes.
Capitalizing on Market Momentum and 400× LeverageIn a derivatives arena where platforms offer up to 400× leverage on perpetual contracts, capital efficiency and market agility are core business metrics. To capture market momentum, an exchange needs the ability to rapidly expand its asset offerings, supporting everything from legacy crypto assets to sudden, trending altcoins across a massive library of trading pairs.
Adopting a flexible, scalable Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS) solution such as Cobo’s could completely rewrite the development timeline for high-growth exchanges. Instead of spending months of engineering capital building out custom backend wallet architectures for every new blockchain network, platforms can deploy localized infrastructure in days.
This agility allows platforms to instantly scale their listings to over a thousand trading pairs without compromising security or delaying time-to-market. It mirrors the exact operational advantages seen during high-velocity market events, similar to how advanced wallet infrastructure empowers platforms during sudden asset surges; allowing exchanges to pass that speed and liquidity directly to their global user base.
A Mature Foundation for GrowthThe synergy between trusted infrastructure ecosystems and global trading platforms represents the natural evolution of a maturing crypto market. As WEEX continues to scale its global spot and derivatives offerings for over 6 million users, adopting robust backend paradigms proves that platforms no longer have to compromise between cutting-edge trading velocity and uncompromised structural security.
ZachXBT: Humanity private key leak and abnormal surge in H token should be viewed separately
On June 9, according to related disclosures, on-chain investigator ZachXBT posted an update on Humanity’s roughly $31 million security incident, saying that after further analyzing fund flows, he currently tends to believe the project team was not involved in an “inside job” or a self-staged attack. According to him, the official explanation about the private key leak was broadly accurate, but before the token unlock, the price of H had been artificially pushed higher, and the hacker later took advantage of that market environment; therefore, the private key leak and the earlier abnormal price pumping should be regarded as two separate and independent events. This reframing has shifted the market’s understanding of the nature of the incident. Earlier discussion around Humanity had focused on whether the team directly participated in the attack or used the security incident to cover up internal operations. ZachXBT’s latest remarks shift the focus from “whether it was self-theft” to “whether there were pre-unlock market structure issues.” He also questioned whether the team may have.



